Dear Axel, For sure YES but from my side I'm afraid on Monday I couldn't make the afternoon part of our WPLs/WPas Audio conf due to other commitments I have. But will be with you and colleagues in the morning hoping Daniel could make the afternoon part. BTW I must say that splitting our audio conf on two part is not that convenient to me. I'm now questioning myself if this is something we should keep or leave. But Here I would need to also here from you Axel and other WPL/WPA colleagues. Because if we agree to experiment it is also important to hear from our experience. Hearing from you and YES yet another thing we could discussed. Best Regards, Pascal De : Fasse, Axel [mailto:axel.fasse at sap.com] Envoyé : vendredi 15 février 2013 14:16 À : BISSON Pascal; JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Cc : fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu Objet : RE: FI-WARE Live demo update Dear Pascal, Dear Juanjo, It think that could be a good topic for our call on Monday. Beside this I would like to bring some additional topics to the agenda: · Status & Planning Open innovation Lab o I have not seen any kind of discussion with the Legal departments and because of that I a really worried about the planned timeline. Actually I can not imagine that we are able to start the OIL in Time. This might lead to additional cost cuttings and "interesting discussions" within the next review · Cost Cutting o I would suggest that TID send's an official mail to the EC that we need the feedback about the resubmission of our deliverables. Otherwise we are not able to do claim the "blocked" efforts in the proposed timeframe o I think it is not possible to wait any longer for their feedback. If it takes additional weeks until they provide the official answer, we will not be able to handle their requests before the next review meeting accordingly. · We need an official time-planning for the deliverables, OIL, Onborading of the new Use-Cases and the reviews as soon as possible o I am talking about deadlines that have been agreed by the EC. Otherwise it is nearly impossible to avoid complains about "... delivery is too late ..." --> cost cutting , .. · Onboarding of the Use-Cases is delayed. Having a look at BEMES, we should not accept these long time that takes the onboarding process of the new partners o Maybe we can mention this topic within one of the next mails to the EC Hopefully we will have the chance to discuss these Topics in Monday. Best regards, Axel From: fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-wpl-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of BISSON Pascal Sent: Freitag, 15. Februar 2013 13:34 To: JUAN JOSE HIERRO SUREDA Cc: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu> Subject: [Fiware-wpl] FI-WARE Live demo update Dear Juanjo, Could we hear from what's happening regarding the FI-WARE Live demo under preparation for next review ? Being said Security chapter was not involved in Fi-WARE live demo for M18 but would like to get involved for M24 live demo could please let me know who should I contact to get first enlisted and second enroll people appointed at the level of my team to work on the topic. Hearing from you. Best Regard p class=MsoNormal>Pascal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-wpl/attachments/20130215/d3cd3e08/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy