Hi Rajiv,
The review process took longer than expected because still there were
changes needed to transform this deliverable into the basis for an
Onboarding Kit for DIHs that may work not just along the duration of the
project but beyond. You may remember that was the most important reason
that justifies creation of this new version of the deliverable.
Now I have produced a version
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m9j9kUES2JHg076aJXR73pVprX9nwI7FmR6GgujN2GQ/edit?usp=sharing>
that, to my taste, is ready for submission if all suggested edits are
accepted. Major changes:
* I produced quite a number of suggestions here and there to allow
this DIH Onboarding Kit becomes "atemporal", that is, can work
beyond duration of the project. I keep them as suggested edits so
that you can perform a very final review.
* I make some major re-structuring of the document which I have
implemented already rather than keeping as suggested edits (because
otherwise the document would show to many changes):
o I dropped the contents related to definition of KPIs for the
Ambassador Programme since they are already covered in another
deliverable and including them here would make that part
obsolete once the current project ends
o I added opportunities of collaboration with i4Trust core
partners as a section within the chapter on the role of DIHs,
rather than in the chapter where it was before.
o I moved the section describing the i4Trust Community platform
into a new chapter, leaving the chapter on the role of DIHs very
clean and focused on that, the role of DIHs
o I moved the chapter on open calls to the end
* I change the wording of the chapter on open calls to make it
generic. I have accepted all my changes so that you have a clean
section to review.
@Rajiv: please review remaining suggested edits to confirm you are ok
with those changes.
@Rajiv: please review contents of the section on collaboration
opportunity with iSHARE
@Rosa: please review contents fo the section on collaboration
opportunity with FundingBox. As already commented by Rajiv, the
existing text taken from the goodbye letter to consortium that finalized
their experiments during the first i4Trust mentoring program (open call
1) doesn't look as valid beyond duration of the current project.
@All: please review contents of the generic open call chapter I have
produced.
I'm this week in Arizona so bear in mind I won't be able to react
until your night. However, I don't see why we shouldn't be able to
finalize the deliverable between today and tomorrow and submit it.
Cheers,
Juanjo
On 31/1/23 09:06, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote:
> Hi Juanjo,
>
> As has been discussed yesterday, can you either finish the deliverable
> D1.7 or send extension request to PO. I still see that this
> deliverable has not been worked upon.
>
> Regards,
> Rajiv Rajani
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 6:03 PM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE
> <rajiv at ishare.eu> wrote:
>
> Hi Juanjo,
>
> Thank you for the review and comments. I have gone through them.
> There are still some open comments if you can have a look at them.
> On section 4, I have added comments and shared with you my
> rationale of having that section.
>
> Regards,
> Rajiv Rajani
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:52 PM Juanjo Hierro
> <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rajiv,
>
> I have conducted a careful revision of D4.1.
>
> In general, the document is well structured, with a lot of
> details which helps the reader to understand what happened.
> Very good in that respect.
>
> However, it was a surprise to find that there were several
> parts of the document which apparently were copy and paste of
> communications of the experiments or global coordination
> meeting minutes. As a consequence, the tone used (e.g.,
> "during the workshop ... your experiment ..." or "... Juanjo
> tends to think that we should run it virtually ..."). Thanks
> god I decided to go for this careful review instead of taking
> as granted everything was ok (and it seemed from a high level
> review).
>
> The decisions on verb tense to use were sometimes rather
> strange. I found inconsistencies in the verb tense being used
> when describing a stage and what happened during the stage.
> Thus, stage 0, 1 and 2 were described in present tense (a bit
> strange) while the description of stage 3 was in past tense.
> I then have changed them all to be past tense since this is a
> report of something that happened, this way also making them
> consistent). It was strange that a future tense was used in
> some cases referring to things that took place in the past
> (overall, when the date was given, e.g., "The Welcome event
> will take place virtually ... until January 28th 2022"). I
> moved them also to past tense. Bottom line, I tried to do my
> best to leave things as harmonized and meaningful as possible
> but took quite some time and rather detailed review.
>
> Besides, that lot of suggested edits here and there.
>
> Please review the suggested edits and produce a clean
> version we can submit.
>
> I will take care of D1.7 tonight.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Juanjo
>
>
> On 23/1/23 11:35, Juanjo Hierro wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As explained on whatsapp, review of the Playbook kept me
>> busy all the time I had booked for reviews during the
>> weekend. Now deliverables 1.7 and 4.1 are top priority.
>>
>> I'm currently on D4.1 as you explained to me that is a
>> longer hanging fruit.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Juanjo
>>
>>
>> On 23/1/23 10:37, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote:
>>> Hi Juanjo,
>>>
>>> It's been days and no updates from your end are still part
>>> of the document. Can you finish the updates today as we had
>>> discussed. I would like that these deliverables are
>>> submitted today itself.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rajiv Rajani
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:36 PM Juanjo Hierro
>>> <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I plan to finalize my final review tonight.
>>> Unfortunately, I couldn't spend the time I was planning
>>> during the weekend and yesterday and today got very busy.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Juanjo
>>>
>>> On 17/1/23 09:32, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote:
>>>> Dear Partners,
>>>>
>>>> Can you please finish your part in D4.1 and D1.7
>>>> deliverables. As was discussed last Friday, I was
>>>> expecting updates in D1.7 but I do not see any updates.
>>>> For D4.1 there are only a few comments, if you can
>>>> close them, we can prepare that deliverable for submission.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rajiv Rajani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 10:24 AM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE
>>>> <rajiv at ishare.eu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Partners,
>>>>
>>>> I have not seen a single edit in any of these
>>>> deliverables from any of you. Can you please make
>>>> sure that you finish the deliverables today so we
>>>> can submit them asap?
>>>>
>>>> Especially, D1.7 has quite some edits pending and
>>>> have been tagged to relevant people, please look
>>>> into it
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rajiv Rajani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:29 PM Rajiv Rajani |
>>>> iSHARE <rajiv at ishare.eu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Partners,
>>>>
>>>> As have been sent earlier following
>>>> deliverables have been shared for your
>>>> contribution and review many times. Given that
>>>> the deadline was already the end of December,
>>>> can we please expedite its finalisation?
>>>>
>>>> D1.4 - Train the Trainers Program
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HS86OinRd5SU4gpncqpXD5uooXhbIR4UDeEm30g4wKs/edit#slide=id.p>
>>>> - I see some contribution is still pending, can
>>>> you finish the same at earliest?
>>>> D1.7 - i4Trust Onboarding Kit
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m9j9kUES2JHg076aJXR73pVprX9nwI7FmR6GgujN2GQ/edit#heading=h.xwd6v0nwb2xe>
>>>> - I have updated the document as per our last
>>>> discussion for my part, remaining contributions
>>>> are pending
>>>> D4.1 - Report on B2B Data Sharing Mentoring
>>>> Program
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WG8KEXu1cigQP-VfoIuAcB1YTh-yIk5A_LpC_rAAbxs/edit#heading=h.xwd6v0nwb2xe> -
>>>> I see mostly the content is updated, however,
>>>> still some of the items are pending. Can you
>>>> finish and review the document?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rajiv Rajani
>>>> CTO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> iSHARE Foundation
>>>> +31 61 796 2003 <tel:+31617962003>
>>>> iSHARE.eu <https://www.ishare.eu/>
>>>> rajiv at ishare.eu
>>>>
>>>> <https://iSHARE.eu>
>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20230201/4b9801d4/attachment-0001.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy