Thank you Juanjo for updating the deliverable. I have reviewed and accepted your suggestions. Only open point is for @Rosa Villaronga <rosa.villaronga at fundingbox.com> to provide the input as you already pointed out. Once she provides I think the document is good to go for submission. Regards, Rajiv Rajani On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 7:34 AM Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote: > Hi Rajiv, > > The review process took longer than expected because still there were > changes needed to transform this deliverable into the basis for an > Onboarding Kit for DIHs that may work not just along the duration of the > project but beyond. You may remember that was the most important reason > that justifies creation of this new version of the deliverable. > > Now I have produced a version > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m9j9kUES2JHg076aJXR73pVprX9nwI7FmR6GgujN2GQ/edit?usp=sharing> > that, to my taste, is ready for submission if all suggested edits are > accepted. Major changes: > > - I produced quite a number of suggestions here and there to allow > this DIH Onboarding Kit becomes "atemporal", that is, can work beyond > duration of the project. I keep them as suggested edits so that you can > perform a very final review. > - I make some major re-structuring of the document which I have > implemented already rather than keeping as suggested edits (because > otherwise the document would show to many changes): > - I dropped the contents related to definition of KPIs for the > Ambassador Programme since they are already covered in another deliverable > and including them here would make that part obsolete once the current > project ends > - I added opportunities of collaboration with i4Trust core partners > as a section within the chapter on the role of DIHs, rather than in the > chapter where it was before. > - I moved the section describing the i4Trust Community platform > into a new chapter, leaving the chapter on the role of DIHs very clean and > focused on that, the role of DIHs > - I moved the chapter on open calls to the end > - I change the wording of the chapter on open calls to make it > generic. I have accepted all my changes so that you have a clean section > to review. > > @Rajiv: please review remaining suggested edits to confirm you are ok > with those changes. > > @Rajiv: please review contents of the section on collaboration > opportunity with iSHARE > > @Rosa: please review contents fo the section on collaboration > opportunity with FundingBox. As already commented by Rajiv, the existing > text taken from the goodbye letter to consortium that finalized their > experiments during the first i4Trust mentoring program (open call 1) > doesn't look as valid beyond duration of the current project. > > @All: please review contents of the generic open call chapter I have > produced. > > I'm this week in Arizona so bear in mind I won't be able to react until > your night. However, I don't see why we shouldn't be able to finalize the > deliverable between today and tomorrow and submit it. > > Cheers, > > Juanjo > > > On 31/1/23 09:06, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote: > > Hi Juanjo, > > As has been discussed yesterday, can you either finish the deliverable > D1.7 or send extension request to PO. I still see that this deliverable has > not been worked upon. > > Regards, > Rajiv Rajani > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 6:03 PM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE <rajiv at ishare.eu> > wrote: > >> Hi Juanjo, >> >> Thank you for the review and comments. I have gone through them. There >> are still some open comments if you can have a look at them. On section 4, >> I have added comments and shared with you my rationale of having that >> section. >> >> Regards, >> Rajiv Rajani >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:52 PM Juanjo Hierro < >> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rajiv, >>> >>> I have conducted a careful revision of D4.1. >>> >>> In general, the document is well structured, with a lot of details >>> which helps the reader to understand what happened. Very good in that >>> respect. >>> >>> However, it was a surprise to find that there were several parts of >>> the document which apparently were copy and paste of communications of the >>> experiments or global coordination meeting minutes. As a consequence, the >>> tone used (e.g., "during the workshop ... your experiment ..." or "... >>> Juanjo tends to think that we should run it virtually ..."). Thanks god I >>> decided to go for this careful review instead of taking as granted >>> everything was ok (and it seemed from a high level review). >>> >>> The decisions on verb tense to use were sometimes rather strange. I >>> found inconsistencies in the verb tense being used when describing a stage >>> and what happened during the stage. Thus, stage 0, 1 and 2 were described >>> in present tense (a bit strange) while the description of stage 3 was in >>> past tense. I then have changed them all to be past tense since this is a >>> report of something that happened, this way also making them consistent). >>> It was strange that a future tense was used in some cases referring to >>> things that took place in the past (overall, when the date was given, e.g., >>> "The Welcome event will take place virtually ... until January 28th >>> 2022"). I moved them also to past tense. Bottom line, I tried to do my >>> best to leave things as harmonized and meaningful as possible but took >>> quite some time and rather detailed review. >>> >>> Besides, that lot of suggested edits here and there. >>> >>> Please review the suggested edits and produce a clean version we can >>> submit. >>> >>> I will take care of D1.7 tonight. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Juanjo >>> >>> >>> On 23/1/23 11:35, Juanjo Hierro wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As explained on whatsapp, review of the Playbook kept me busy all the >>> time I had booked for reviews during the weekend. Now deliverables 1.7 and >>> 4.1 are top priority. >>> >>> I'm currently on D4.1 as you explained to me that is a longer hanging >>> fruit. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Juanjo >>> >>> >>> On 23/1/23 10:37, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote: >>> >>> Hi Juanjo, >>> >>> It's been days and no updates from your end are still part of the >>> document. Can you finish the updates today as we had discussed. I would >>> like that these deliverables are submitted today itself. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Rajiv Rajani >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 6:36 PM Juanjo Hierro < >>> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I plan to finalize my final review tonight. Unfortunately, I >>>> couldn't spend the time I was planning during the weekend and yesterday and >>>> today got very busy. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Juanjo >>>> On 17/1/23 09:32, Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE wrote: >>>> >>>> Dear Partners, >>>> >>>> Can you please finish your part in D4.1 and D1.7 deliverables. As was >>>> discussed last Friday, I was expecting updates in D1.7 but I do not see any >>>> updates. >>>> For D4.1 there are only a few comments, if you can close them, we can >>>> prepare that deliverable for submission. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 10:24 AM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE <rajiv at ishare.eu> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Partners, >>>>> >>>>> I have not seen a single edit in any of these deliverables from any of >>>>> you. Can you please make sure that you finish the deliverables today so we >>>>> can submit them asap? >>>>> >>>>> Especially, D1.7 has quite some edits pending and have been tagged to >>>>> relevant people, please look into it >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 4:29 PM Rajiv Rajani | iSHARE <rajiv at ishare.eu> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Partners, >>>>>> >>>>>> As have been sent earlier following deliverables have been shared for >>>>>> your contribution and review many times. Given that the deadline was >>>>>> already the end of December, can we please expedite its finalisation? >>>>>> >>>>>> D1.4 - Train the Trainers Program >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HS86OinRd5SU4gpncqpXD5uooXhbIR4UDeEm30g4wKs/edit#slide=id.p> >>>>>> - I see some contribution is still pending, can you finish the same at >>>>>> earliest? >>>>>> D1.7 - i4Trust Onboarding Kit >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1m9j9kUES2JHg076aJXR73pVprX9nwI7FmR6GgujN2GQ/edit#heading=h.xwd6v0nwb2xe> >>>>>> - I have updated the document as per our last discussion for my part, >>>>>> remaining contributions are pending >>>>>> D4.1 - Report on B2B Data Sharing Mentoring Program >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WG8KEXu1cigQP-VfoIuAcB1YTh-yIk5A_LpC_rAAbxs/edit#heading=h.xwd6v0nwb2xe> - >>>>>> I see mostly the content is updated, however, still some of the items are >>>>>> pending. Can you finish and review the document? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Rajiv Rajani >>>>>> CTO >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> iSHARE Foundation >>>>>> +31 61 796 2003 <+31617962003> >>>>>> iSHARE.eu <https://www.ishare.eu/> >>>>>> rajiv at ishare.eu >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://iSHARE.eu> >>>>>> >>>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20230201/8e5082b4/attachment-0001.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy