[Fiware-apps] FW: [Fiware-wpa] Initial the feedback

[Leidig, Torsten]

FYI

From: fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-wpa-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Juanjo Hierro
Sent: Dienstag, 22. November 2011 19:13
To: fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu; fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu
Subject: [Fiware-wpa] Initial the feedback

Dear colleagues,

  Please find enclosed the notes I took regarding the early feedback by our PO and the reviewers.

  Thanks all of you for the great effort preparing this review.   Overall, I believe the results are pretty positive and encouraging,

-- Juanjo


General comments:

One of the reviewers: This is a good FP7 project.   This is not the special thing we would wait.

Clear sign of commitment.

Focused on pragmatism, getting something useful.   Something they subscribe and could make a difference compared to regular projects.

Pretty solid.

Dialog with PPP UC project seems to be happening.   But will see with deliverables.

Quite encouraging the effort in aligning the GEs.   Risk is not so much what the project does but whether it is relevant in the market.

Still a little bit technology pushed.

What you should you focus on first.   Most difficult parts first should be the approach ?

Not so much about creating the technology but how can be used and how useful could be.

In exploitation plan in month 12 they expect to see actual facts regarding adoption by partners rather

People clearly committed ... but what about companies ?   They expect companies to be behind for a project like this.   Doesn't see the same level of commitment by all partners.  (later a reviewer mentioned):  Is the people of Marketing calling you eager to hear you explain what you have to tell them ?

Results have to be useful, usable and used.   Cannot be made only by technology oriented.

We have here a shorter time to the market in the project.   Following the Agile principles, we should seek for having something the soon the best.   Even if it is not perfect.

Third party innovation: who should be the prime users ?  What kind of developers ?   Developers in a garage ?   Developers in a big company ?  Who are you comparing with ?  Apparently Google and Apple.   But then what do we bring that is different ?   IoT maybe one thing.

Distinction between GE and SE ... not sure whether a definition are not needed.   Such guidance may be needed on this respects for Open Call.

Open Calls: we should be open to topics that submitters may surprise us

Take into account that 30%

Spread tasks and responsibilities more within the consortia.   Now, it sounds like just a few people (the "Santa Claus" they said) are doing most of the work and if they fail (accident), there is a real issue.


Deliverables:

Detailed comments will come once the reviewers finalize their review, but overall their initial feedback is that all will be accepted.   They consider that the first release of DevCommE was not formally submitted but they understand why (here we have the issue about what has to be submitted linked to a deliverable like this)
________________________________
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-apps/attachments/20111125/a3ba0429/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00001.txt
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-apps/attachments/20111125/a3ba0429/attachment.txt>