Dear Markus, dear all, As stated in your email, UPM will be very busy until the 2nd review meeting because we are involved in (and somehow leading) documenting and developing the live demo that will be presented to the reviewers. I think that changing the suggested timeline won't lead us to a better scenario. If our colleagues from UDE accept to serve as the lead editors, we will do our best to contribute as well. Apart from this, I think that the participation of each partner, including iMinds will be key for the success of the task force. Bearing in mind that we are talking about a SotA, being new in the project won't be an obstacle to provide input. On the contrary, because of the fact that iMinds is new in the project, it will be very difficult for the rest of us to tackle the SotA in "Business Elements and Models Execution and Simulation" without their input. Ps. Markus, be aware that UDE's mailboxes are rejecting our emails. Best regards, Javier 2013/4/25 Heller, Markus <markus.heller at sap.com> > Dear WP3 members,**** > > ** ** > > For our *WP3 contribution to **“State of the Art” deliverable**:* > > ** ** > > First we need to fix contributors now - and after that proceed with TOC, > writing, etc. (see mail from Miguel below with information from him on > this). > > **** > > Please be reminded, that *academic partners* are seen as major > contributors here for this deliverable.**** > > And, If I get it right, the team of the WP3 task 3.3 (Business Framework)can (and should) contribute here as > well.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > I see three Todo’s now for us with *Deadline* *Friday 26.04. EOB*:** > > ** ** > > **(1) **@ALL: Please *check **suggested* *timeline* by Miguel (see > below his mail) if ok for you:**** > > ** ** > > May, 7 - Contributions from chapters to be sent by email (consolidated in > a single doc per WP)**** > > May, 10 - Peer Review ready (academia partners)**** > > May, 17 - Feedback incorporated **** > > May, 20 - Delivery **** > > ** ** > > **(2) **@UDE: would you be able to be the lead editor?**** > > ** ** > > **(3) **Contributor list: We have polled today with result in today’s > telco (please correct otherwise) (missing were: UDE, TI, THALES, ENG, > EAB, DT):**** > > - ATOS: Contributing**** > > - TID: Contributing, but may not lead effort **** > > - SAP: Contributing**** > > - UPM: Would like to contribute, but has lot to do for Live Demo, very > difficult to contribute due to timeline (will check until Monday if > timeline ok)**** > > - Iminds: New, rather not**** > > ** ** > > @UDE, TI, THALES, E-IIS, EAB, DT: Please indicate with mail to me/all how > you see your contributor role in the deliverable?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > We will then follow up with your answers next week.**** > > ** ** > > Please do not hesitate to approach me with any comments or > problems/additions on this.**** > > ** ** > > Best wishes**** > > Markus**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > D.2.6.b, c**** > > *State of the Art Analysis – Emerging Technologies*.**** > > This deliverable provides a view on the state of the art, concerning > technologies that are considered relevant to the Future Internet. The > document will analyze the most recent technological advances as well as > innovative market disruptions and user trends that may impact or are > already impacting the Future Internet. It will also analyse the activities > and recent results of the most relevant initiatives and projects at > national, European and International level.**** > > This analysis will help to identify which are the major differentiation > points of FI-WARE components released in month 12, 24 and 33. It will also > help to identify gaps as well as technologies in which to focus further > work.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > El 24/04/2013 1:05, Miguel Carrillo escribió:**** > > Dear all, > > As you are aware, we agreed in the last WPL/WPA call to create a skeleton > based on the State of the Art in the DoW. I am sending you this skeleton > that you can start filling in now. *This needs to be heavily edited by > each WP*. The one who drives the process is the *WPL *and the *WPA*. The > main actor here should be the *academia*, as expressed in the DoW. I > encourage the WPL/WPA to primarily rely on them for this work. > > Note that we do not want a section per GE, try to group in sections like > the ones we have now, not GE per GE. > > This will be edited directly on the Word document as the result will not > go to the wiki. Each WP will deliver their section by the 7th of May. > > I remind you the schedule (the one on the minutes of meeting)**** > > **· **April, 23 - Skeleton ready **** > > **· **May, 7 - Contributions from chapters to be sent by email > (consolidated in a single doc per WP)**** > > **· **May, 10 - Peer Review ready (academia partners)**** > > **· **May, 17 - Feedback incorporated **** > > - May, 20 - Delivery **** > > > I will consolidate all the inputs and will put a brief text in the > introductory sections. > > Best regards, > > Miguel**** > > ** ** > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-apps mailing list > Fiware-apps at lists.fi-ware.eu > https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-apps > > -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-apps/attachments/20130429/48839e9b/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy