[Fiware-iot] Arch Description Problems

[Bisztray, Denes (NSN - HU/Budapest)]

Dear All,

There are some problems with the description of most of the GEs.

1st group:
There is absolutely no change compared to my initial sketch:
*	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.ConnectivityManagement <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.ConnectivityManagement> 
*	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.ServiceControl <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.ServiceControl> 
*	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.DeviceFrontend <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.DeviceFrontend> 
*	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DataPooling <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DataPooling> 
*	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DataAccessPolicy <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DataAccessPolicy> 
*	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.LocalStorage <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.LocalStorage> 
This is a LOT! As far as I understand, the Gateway GEs are Telecom Italia's and Ericssons' responsibility. The three Communication GEs on the backend should be also done by the IoT Communication Chapter, which also falls to Telecom Italia. 
2nd group:
Minimal description:
-	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.Exposure <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.Exposure> 
-	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.ConnectivityManagement <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.ConnectivityManagement> 
-	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DeviceFrontend <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DeviceFrontend> 

These GEs are described in a minimalistic manner. Also they hardy follow the template. The template is clear, Overview with possible architecture description. Basic Concepts and then Interactions. Most of these GEs mix these things up AND/OR does not describe elementary concepts that needed in order to understand the description (i.e. the SCL is not defined anywhere but used a lot), also there are no information model in most cases .

3rd group:
Missing elements:
-	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DataHandling <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Gateway.DataHandling> 

The Main Interactions section is completely missing.

3rd group: 
Missing GE.
-	Service Control GE from the Gateway. Although it was not in my initial FMC model, Gian Piero asked to have it in the Gateway. It is missing currently.

Please, we have only half day before the deadline, and this is seriously a lot of work. For examples please have a look at these:
-	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.Exposure <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.Exposure> 
-	FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.ThingsAndResourcesManagement <https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-private/index.php/FIWARE.ArchitectureDescription.IoT.Backend.ThingsAndResourcesManagement> 

I'm sorry if I sound desperate, but 2 out of 12 GEs are finished in a reasonably good manner one day before the deadline. Please don't count on the WPA this time to fill the missing gaps. 

Best,
Dénes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-iot/attachments/20120216/910ff434/attachment.html>