Hi all, I took the liberty to also add the ETSI M2M to Zigbee mapping as a item we are monitoring. @ Gian Piero, can it be formulated like this? Please check https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/exploitation/index.php/Mapping_Internet_of_Things - Ernö > -----Original Message----- > From: fiware-iot-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-iot- > bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Ernoe Kovacs > Sent: Montag, 30. Juli 2012 19:49 > To: Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest); fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: [Fiware-iot] FI-Ware Standardisation > > Hi Lorant, all, > > looking at the table of the IoT-Chapter standardization bodies, I am missing > ETSI M2M. I have added it. > > We are contributing here already on the "Semantic Support for M2M Data" > work item. > > Or did I missed a discussion/decision not to include it? > > Note: I am adding it tentatively... > - Ernö > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-iot mailing list > Fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu > http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-iot
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy