Hi Lorant, if your refer to body row 2 in the Table 1. I entered yesterday evening. Now there is a consistent flow from Table 1 to Table 2 to Table 3. - Ernö > -----Original Message----- > From: Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest) [mailto:lorant.farkas at nsn.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:52 > To: Ernoe Kovacs; fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: RE: FI-Ware Standardisation > > Hi Ernö, > > It is there in the 1st table, but maybe that is the wrong place. > > Thanks & Br, > > Lorant > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Ernoe Kovacs [mailto:Ernoe.Kovacs at neclab.eu] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 7:49 PM > To: Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest); fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu > Subject: FI-Ware Standardisation > > Hi Lorant, all, > > looking at the table of the IoT-Chapter standardization bodies, I am missing > ETSI M2M. I have added it. > > We are contributing here already on the "Semantic Support for M2M Data" > work item. > > Or did I missed a discussion/decision not to include it? > > Note: I am adding it tentatively... > - Ernö >
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy