[Fiware-iot] FI-Ware Standardisation

Ernoe Kovacs Ernoe.Kovacs at neclab.eu
Tue Jul 31 09:18:09 CEST 2012


Hi Lorant,

if your refer to body row 2 in the Table 1. I entered yesterday evening.
Now there is a consistent flow from Table 1 to Table 2 to Table 3.


- Ernö

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest) [mailto:lorant.farkas at nsn.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2012 07:52
> To: Ernoe Kovacs; fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu
> Subject: RE: FI-Ware Standardisation
> 
> Hi Ernö,
> 
> It is there in the 1st table, but maybe that is the wrong place.
> 
> Thanks & Br,
> 
> Lorant
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Ernoe Kovacs [mailto:Ernoe.Kovacs at neclab.eu]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 7:49 PM
> To: Farkas, Lorant (NSN - HU/Budapest); fiware-iot at lists.fi-ware.eu
> Subject: FI-Ware Standardisation
> 
> Hi Lorant, all,
> 
> looking at the table of the IoT-Chapter standardization bodies, I am missing
> ETSI M2M. I have added it.
> 
> We are contributing here already on the "Semantic Support for M2M Data"
> work item.
> 
> Or did I missed a discussion/decision not to include it?
> 
> Note: I am adding it tentatively...
> - Ernö
> 




More information about the Old-Fiware-iot mailing list

You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy   Cookies policy