[Fiware-security] FI-WARE - Architecture issues/concerns (PLEASE REPORT)

[BISSON Pascal]

Robert,

>From my side, I don't think a questionnaire would be appropriate nor solve the issue there.

Being said we have tools which have been put in place and that we are committed to use.  This doesn't we can't report problems on those tools (definitely we have and so it as to reported also by you leading T8.2) in order to improve them and get what we need. I

Once more this is something we could report at plenary session (at task level but also at consolidated wp level).


So would suggest to proceed like this and to also address this type of issues in your T8.2 sldieset.

Best Regards,
Pascal


De : Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich) [mailto:robert.seidl at nsn.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 19 janvier 2012 10:58
À : BISSON Pascal; TRABELSI, Slim; DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; Michael Osborne
Cc : LELEU Philippe
Objet : RE: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE - Architecture issues/concerns (PLEASE REPORT)

Add-on to my email:

It would be beneficial for us, if we from WP8 provide kind of a template as a questioner to the other WP's.
This would also make life easier for us, since we have kind of a standardised set of info which reflects our needs.

What do you think about this proposal Pascal, Daniel.
If positive, would you be willing to provide this template?


From: fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] On Behalf Of Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich)
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:46 AM
To: ext BISSON Pascal; TRABELSI, Slim; DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; Michael Osborne
Cc: LELEU Philippe
Subject: Re: [Fiware-security] FI-WARE - Architecture issues/concerns (PLEASE REPORT)

Hi Pascal,
for me the hottest topic is to get clear requirements from other WP's.
E.g. on Monday this week we had a session with WP7 (Hans Einsiedler, Deutsche Telekom, WPL) in order to get their requirements related to IDM.
During the telco it turned out that they still have to think about it and for that reason that there are no requirements related to IDM at the moment.
They promised to put this on the WP7 agenda for the upcoming meeting in Madrid.
So again, for me concrete requirements would be appreciated.

Greetings
Robert

From: ext BISSON Pascal [mailto:pascal.bisson at thalesgroup.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 10:22 AM
To: Seidl, Robert (NSN - DE/Munich); TRABELSI, Slim; DI CERBO, Francesco; fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu; Micha BISSON Pascal; GIDOIN Daniel; LELEU Philippe
Subject: FI-WARE - Architecture issues/concerns (PLEASE REPORT)
Importance: High

Dear Colleagues,

As said Daniel and I will join the joint WPA(WPL) meeting. Focus is on  joint WPA meeting to align on architectural issues.

Daniel and I will join on behalf of the security team. Daniel will be attending as Security Architect of WP8.

I do think this is a unique opportunity for us to make progress on architectural stuff and also converge with other participants ecture (better integrating the bits and pices coming from each of the ATs). As such I insist to get architectural issues and also (hot) questions/topics  to voice from our side (also yours) at this meeting. We will join to ours and try to have them addressed  and get back to you with responses formulated at this internal type of Architecture Board meeting.

Counting on you ALL and especially task leads, caretakers but also members of this team to mcontribute their hot and topical architectural questions by Tomorrow so Friday 20/01/2012 EOB.

Many thanks in advance and consider it as a unique opportunity to get AB answers to topical questions this team has!
lang=EN-US>
Hearing from you.

Best Regards,
Pascal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20120119/2cc8a589/attachment.html>