[Fiware-security] Webinar - Data Handling GE

[Juanjo Hierro]

Hi,

  Sorry but it's up to the chapters to check about potential collisions and avoid them as much as possible (e.g., choosing different dates or trying to contact the parallel webinar author to find out a solution).   That's one of the main reason we are all sharing the information.

  There is no action to be taken on my side.   Centralizing decisions would only lead to bottlenecks.

  Cheers,

-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es<http://www.tid.es>
email: jhierro at tid.es<mailto:jhierro at tid.es>
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932


On 19/11/12 14:56, BISSON Pascal wrote:
Dear Slim,

I sincerely regret what has happened to the first Data Handling GE webinar you organized. Being said the dates of the webinars are shared between us (FI-WARE Chapters) and UC projects this is something that could have been avoided through a better organization of the Webinars (avoiding webinars dates/timeslots clashes just to mention one ...) and also asking registered attendees to be committed to attend the webinars they registered to. In the meantime it is also true that those webinars were also asked to be organized with some time constraints (especially with respect to the two weeks to have them done). In the meantime I can also understand the rationale (to get these webinars phase 1 to take place before the EC review meeting for us to argue ...).
So yes let's try to avoid such a clash for the second series of webinars this with full support of Juanjo (that I put in cc of this email for him to first be aware and second take action also on his side for such an issue no to re-occur ... ). This independently of actions we could also take from our Security Chapter side.

Best Regards,
Pascal

PS: @Juanjo please report us and also WP/WPA and you plans to avoid such a situation a next webinars week (useless to say this is something we definitely need to avoid ...)

De : fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu> [mailto:fiware-security-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] De la part de TRABELSI, Slim
Envoyé : lundi 19 novembre 2012 11:30
À : fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-security at lists.fi-ware.eu>
Objet : [Fiware-security] Webinar - Data Handling GE

Hi Pascal,

We just finished our first webinar for the Data Handling GE.
One the 8 attendees announced, only 2 were present. Not pat 100% present because we just discovered that another webinar was starting at 11 ... so they were switching between the two.
It a pity to have such few attendees ! of course we didn't get any feedback.

I hope that the next session will be more attractive.

Best
Slim


=====================================
Dr Slim Trabelsi
Senior Researcher

Security & Trust
SAP Labs France
805, Av du Docteur Maurice Donat
06250 Mougins, France

T +33 4 92 28 63 45
M +33 6 11 99 85 79
www.sap.com<http://www.sap.com>




________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-security/attachments/20121119/a6e6cb46/attachment.html>