[Fiware-testbed] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: 2nd review report (month 9)

[stefano de panfilis]

dear all,

attached the review report for m9.
congratulations to all for the great assessment by the ec and reviewers!

ciao,
stefano

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es>
Date: 2012/5/14
Subject: [Fiware-wpl] Fwd: FI-WARE: 2nd review report (month 9)
To: "fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>, "
fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu" <fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu>


 Hi all,

  The EC has sent a review report on the activities carried out, as well as
the deliverables due, before end of month 9.   I have to confess that this
has been a nice surprise (among other things, because it will help us to
better focus our 1st year review by June 21-22)

  I haven't had time to read it completely, just a quick reading of the
overall assessment.   D2.3a, D2.4a, and D11.4a have been rejected and have
to be re-submitted once detailed comments provided by the reviewers are
addressed.   The rest of deliverables are accepted though D.2.1.1 and
D.1.3.1 with some reservations.   The reviewers applaud the quality of the
testbed design as documented in deliverable D10.1a.

  Regarding D2.3a and D2.4a, the following is said in the overall
assessment:

*While much of the material produced for the key deliverable D2.3a is of
good to very good quality, the level of quality is not consistent, with
several major issues affecting deliverables D2.3a and D2.4a to the degree
that remedial attention is required before they can be accepted. *


  while regarding D11.4, the following is said in the overall assessment
(probably we need to read the detailed comments to understand it better):

*deliverable D11.4a is also rejected due to a lack of clarity on how
standardisation contributions will be properly aligned with one another*


  Overall, the project is scored in the lower scale of acceptable progress
so, definitively, we all have to devote the necessary resources to improve
that score.   I believe it is feasible if we carefully review the
recommendations made in the review and implement the necessary remedy
actions.    Fortunately, some actions that have been already planned (e.g.,
educational sessions with the UC projects, dedicated team covering
management of UC tickets, ...) are in this direction, but we will have to
add some more.

  Please distribute among the members of your Chapter teams.

  Best regards,

-- Juanjo

-------------
Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital
website: www.tid.es
email: jhierro at tid.es
twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro

FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Chief Architect

You can follow FI-WARE at:
  website:  http://www.fi-ware.eu
  facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242
  twitter:  http://twitter.com/FIware
  linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932



-------- Original Message --------  Subject: FI-WARE: 2nd review report
(month 9)  Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:47:06 +0200  From:
Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu
<Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu><Arian.ZWEGERS at ec.europa.eu>  To:
JOSE JIMENEZ DELGADO <jimenez at tid.es> <jimenez at tid.es>, JUAN JOSE HIERRO
SUREDA <jhierro at tid.es> <jhierro at tid.es>  CC: Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu
<Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu> <Annalisa.Bogliolo at ec.europa.eu>,
Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu
<Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu><Federica.TAGLIANI at ec.europa.eu>,
bel.piet1 at gmail.com <bel.piet1 at gmail.com> <bel.piet1 at gmail.com>,
renaud.difrancesco at eu.sony.com
<renaud.difrancesco at eu.sony.com><renaud.difrancesco at eu.sony.com>,
rdifrancesco at ymail.com <rdifrancesco at ymail.com> <rdifrancesco at ymail.com>,
dgr at whitestein.com <dgr at whitestein.com> <dgr at whitestein.com>,
msli at icfocus.co.uk <msli at icfocus.co.uk> <msli at icfocus.co.uk>,
irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com
<irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com><irena.pavlova at isoft-technology.com>

 Dear Jose, Juanjo,

Please find enclosed the outcome of the second FI-WARE review. No paper
version will follow.

Please distribute the review report to the partners in the consortium.

Please acknowledge the receipt of this e-mail.

This is an informal notification. The formal submission will follow soon
and will not be different.

Best regards,
Arian Zwegers


------------------------------

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
receive email on the basis of the terms set out at.
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

_______________________________________________
Fiware-wpl mailing list
Fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu
http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-wpl




-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20120514/0ae97493/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: FI-WARE Review 2 Report.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 148584 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20120514/0ae97493/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Cover FI-WARE review 2 report.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 33689 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20120514/0ae97493/attachment-0001.pdf>