[Fiware-testbed] wp10 phc postponing it again ....

[stefano de panfilis]

dear pascal,



> In the meantime I’m a bit surprised to have only two answer regarding
> questionnaires. When do we expect the others to come ?
>

honestly i'm not as all of them are on their poc these days.
so we agreed to ahev them for next fi-ppp ab that will be on 13-14 march.

ciao,
stefano



> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Best Regards,****
>
> Pascal****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *De :* fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu [mailto:
> fiware-testbed-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *De la part de* stefano de
> panfilis
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 8 février 2013 13:34
> *À :* fiware-testbed at lists.fi-ware.eu
> *Objet :* [Fiware-testbed] wp10 phc postponing it again ....****
>
> ** **
>
> dear all,****
>
> as some of you already know, juanjo has fixed a quite important wpl/wpa
> phc on this monday (11 feb) lasting the whole day so clashing with our
> weekly phc.****
>
> so tow main options in fron of us: postponing or skipping.****
>
> main duties in this period we have in front of us are:****
>
> 1. reallocation of eab budget****
>
> 2. uc projects validation support****
>
> 3. testbed architecture deliverable****
>
> point 1.****
>
> on this issue i got the appruval from the pcc about the following:
> "- 90k left by eab
> - proposal:
> -- deployment tool (initial discussion between eng and ibm this to enhance
> the cloud portal functionalities) and in general additional support to task
> t10.2
> -- more support to validation task t10.5
> -- The new DoW should include a clearer definition and allocation of
> activities of the Open Innovation Lab. A new task will be created."****
>
> honestly on my desk i received only a proposal from miguel about the
> creation of a new task (t10.6) for the support to the open innovation lab
> (oil its horrible acronym at the moment). i think this his proposal is a
> good one, but certainly we need to work on it a bit more (@miguel i'll send
> to you in the next hours some ideas from us). on the other approved
> directions i did not receive so far any proposals.****
>
> point 2.****
>
> at the last ab fi-ppp i gave a presentation on the results from "first
> impression survey" and a tutorial on the validation questionnaire (attached
> the two answers - smartagrifood and instantmobility - i received at the
> moment still in their draft form). i offer in behalf of the fi-ware testbed
> team any kind of support on the matter. let's see if any request comes ....
> ****
>
> point 3.****
>
> i still missing or lost may be the final requirements to the procurement
> red.es will launch (i saw some emails on the matter).****
>
> given all the above my suggestion is to skip again our weekly phc. this
> means in the next coming days i have to receive concrete proposals on eab
> budget reallocation are provided as at the next phc we must formalise a
> proposal to the pcc.****
>
> pleas let me know if you agree or see the need to have a phc before next
> monday (18 feb).
>
> ****
>
> --
> Stefano De Panfilis
> Chief Innovation Officer
> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
> via Riccardo Morandi 32
> 00148 Roma
> Italy
>
> tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
> fax: +39-068307-4200
> cell: +39-335-7542-567****
>



-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130208/b93a79fb/attachment.html>