[Fiware-testbed] mail to fiware@

[stefano de panfilis]

dear thorsten,

the email is fine for me and you can certainly forward it.
honetsly i think the other colleagues will be very much involved in the
geis delivery process, so even if from one side analysisng the validation
migth help them to provide better versions of the new and phase 1 geis, on
the other side i think they will be concentrated on the delivery only ...

anyway better to send and remind the issue during the next wlp/wpa board
which, i can anticipate you, i cannot attend.

ciao,
stefano


2013/5/15 Sandfuchs, Thorsten <thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com>

>  [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> You chose to allow
> thorsten.sandfuchs at sap.com even though this message failed authentication
> Click to disallow<https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc_serial=14147202665&tc_rand=218161185&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_AFA&utm_content=001&action=authfail&set=false&token=33N1%2Foj%2Bhsf0Ki%2FvloZEjrCvcO7Ggcam%2B2023jnZauG1dTUs6IsO1lF2HmyiCHXQ&key=k43d%2BxCr6C%2ByzKjEDQ%2Bwd2yLcPEdaFdGLOYBLn7l9Hc%3D>
>
>  Dear colleagues,****
>
> I think we should send out an email to fiware@ exposing the current
> status of D.10.5.2 and asking for contributions. Here is my draft.****
>
> ** **
>
> Anything I might forgot? Would you disagree to send something like this?**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Best,****
>
>                                                /Thorsten****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Dear fi-ware colleagues and GE providers,****
>
> while in former conversations we approached the GE providers directly, we
> want to engage more with everybody in the consortium.****
>
> ** **
>
> On the 14.05. we release the validation report of FI-PPP use cases from
> phase 1 to the EC in a “in time” and not “complete” version. You can find
> the document in the fi-ware-private wiki and in the docman (e.g.
> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/index.php/D.10.5.2.Report_on_Validation_process_including_Validation_with_Use_Case_projects_front_page- and the linked pages!)
> ****
>
> It touches on how the Use case of phase 1 planned and executed the
> validation of FI-WARE GEs.****
>
> ** **
>
> Please familiarize yourself with the content especially the part about the
> validation execution report on the following page is interesting for GE
> providers that want to know more on how their component was rated or how to
> find this out
> https://forge.fi-ware.eu/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fi-ware-review/index.php/The_Validation_Report.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> As you can read in the executive summary, we expect that we have to
> resubmit this deliverable within the july time frame. For phase 2 UC
> projects there will be a separate process to refine the validation process
> tailored to their needs.****
>
> ** **
>
> The “Validation Report” is only the beginning - within the next months and
> subsequently we have to *work on chapter-specific analysis* of the
> validation answers (metrics and scenario documents) which has been provided
> to us. We are still waiting for 3 use cases to finalize their projects and
> send us the relevant documents, but we should already start documenting
> more thoroughly what happened during the past month with the UC projects
> and how they did find it.****
>
> ** **
>
> In the end this can be a chance for everybody to get crisp messages for
> the review in June! Being relevant, usefull and used and being able to
> “proof” this.****
>
> ** **
>
> Please find all scenario descriptions (on where they used FI-WARE GEs) and
> the answers to all the GEs (star-ratings and free text) in the private
> docman: https://forge.fi-ware.eu/docman/?group_id=27 Folder: “Validation”
> ****
>
> ****
>
> If you want to know how to use the xls-pivot table to your advantage in
> order to see “your” rating – or the rating of the chapter, have a look at
> the Validation Report, referenced above.****
>
> ** **
>
> As said we will furthermore engage with you and gather * your* view and
> ask for your analysis of the answers provided towards your chapter or your
> component. This will be most probably gathered in the fi-ware-private wiki
> and has a PP-only dissemination level.****
>
> ** **
>
> thanks****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> -- ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Thorsten Sandfuchs****
>
> ** **
>
> SAP AG | Vincenz-Priessnitz-Strasse 1 | D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany |
> www.sap.com ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Pflichtangaben/Mandatory Disclosure Statements:
> http://www.sap.com/company/legal/impressum.epx ****
>
> ** **
>
> Diese E-Mail kann Betriebs- oder Geschäftsgeheimnisse oder sonstige
> vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Sollten Sie diese E-Mail irrtümlich
> erhalten haben, ist Ihnen eine Kenntnisnahme des Inhalts, eine
> Vervielfältigung oder Weitergabe der E-Mail ausdrücklich untersagt. Bitte
> benachrichtigen Sie uns und vernichten Sie die empfangene E-Mail. Vielen
> Dank. ****
>
> ** **
>
> This e-mail may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed, or
> otherwise confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in
> error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying, or distribution of
> it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the
> original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation.****
>
> ** **
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this mail!****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>


-- 
Stefano De Panfilis
Chief Innovation Officer
Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
via Riccardo Morandi 32
00148 Roma
Italy

tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
fax: +39-068307-4200
cell: +39-335-7542-567
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130515/8c505e12/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 8783 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-testbed/attachments/20130515/8c505e12/attachment.jpg>