Hi Matteo, The overall structure looks fine to me. When we get into the more details, I think we need to talk about / define the following as well: * Roles: what roles do we involved in our methodology * Artifacts: what are the (even interim) products that are produced * Standards: which ones are recommended/considered by us If you see fit, we can already have subsections for these in the structure. Cheers, Roozbeh From: Matteo Melideo <matteo.melideo at eng.it<mailto:matteo.melideo at eng.it>> Reply-To: Matteo Melideo <matteo.melideo at eng.it<mailto:matteo.melideo at eng.it>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:28:52 +0100 To: WP9_fi-ware <fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu<mailto:fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu>> Subject: [Fiware-tools] Methodology ToC Dear All, attached you can find a preliminary ToC of the methodology. Any comment is more than welcome. In addition to this, please let's think of what the three different versions will contain a part for improvements of the already existing texts, react to the reviewers comments, etc. In other words, do we want characterize since now the three versions of the document we are going to provide? Regard and have a nice w/e M.
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy