[Fiware-tools] New requirements to be collected

[Matteo Melideo]

Dear Stefano,
thank you very much for your valuable inputs and proposal but personally 
I have to look at what is important and valuable for WP9. I would never 
like to hear the reviewers or whoever say:  we never received any 
questionnaire from WP9 or where are the UC requirements. Said that, the 
UC projects are obviously free to not answer and we will stay with this 
but I want to be sure to have a clean conscience and to have done all 
the possible effort to satisfy the needs of the UC projects collecting 
as much requirements as possible and explaining what we are doing.

However, given this important news, we will try to make the 
questionnaire more like a recap of the functionality offered by FI-CoDE 
where they will be asked to put just a cross on those they consider the 
more valuable or high priority for them.


Thanks again and say bye to everyone :-)

M.

P.S.
A favour, if Juanjo is still around, please remind him the mail to the 
PO about the roadmap. It is important!!! :-)

Il 12/09/2012 22:31, stefano de panfilis ha scritto:
> dear matteo,
>
> as you know i'm attending the meeting of the fi-ppp ab where all the 
> uc attend.
> we, as testbed team, already prepared and presented today a 
> questionnaire for geis validation which, depsite the fact it has very 
> few questions, they hardly accepted to fill in, but they did.
>
> submitting another one will simply overwhelm them without, most 
> likely, any real good answer.
> my suggestion is that you will add to the questionnaire here attched 
> for your convenience in case one or two specific questions perhpahs in 
> the overal section.
> the actual questionnaire is section 4.
>
> please let me know, within tomorrow noon if can as the meeting will 
> finish at 15:00 here, i.e. 14:00 cet.
>
> ciao,
> stefano
>
> 2012/9/12 Matteo Melideo <matteo.melideo at eng.it 
> <mailto:matteo.melideo at eng.it>>
>
>     Dear All,
>     it is our idea to circulate a new questionnaire to the UC projects
>     to collect the last requirements from them after they better
>     looked at what we are doing concretely, at the catalogue and,
>     mainly, they are starting to play with the GEs. We think this
>     could be extremely valuable to pave the way to the next UC
>     projects that will join in 2013 in order to sell them a solution
>     that is also source of their inputs and expectations and
>     concentrate from now on only on the development and the solution
>     of the bugs issued by the FI-CoDE adopters.
>
>     I also thinks that It is also a means to understand if we are
>     "satisfying" their needs or not and in case adjust the goal.
>
>     In this respect, I have adapted a questionnaire starting from a
>     previous one but I would like that you review and update you
>     sections accordingly in order to circulate this on Friday the
>     15th. Exactly one month before the deadline.
>
>     Thanks a lot in advance and best regards
>
>     Matteo
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Fiware-tools mailing list
>     Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu>
>     http://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Stefano De Panfilis
> Chief Innovation Officer
> Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.
> via Riccardo Morandi 32
> 00148 Roma
> Italy
>
> tel (direct): +39-068307-4295
> tel (secr.): +39-068307-4513
> fax: +39-068307-4200
> cell: +39-335-7542-567
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20120913/fdad16e1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: matteo_melideo.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 354 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20120913/fdad16e1/attachment.vcf>