Thank you Pedro, I have also received the agreement from Marcel (IBM) with regards this last proposal. BR Davide On 25/10/2013 10:04, Pedro Rodriguez wrote: > Dear All, > > Here at UPM, we agree with this last proposal (Davide’s). As far as > the Catalogue goes, we will definitely have to provide support until > all the deliverables (not only in this WP) are done so it makes sense > to delay the deliverable until M36 and keep working on it. > > Best Regards > -- > Pedro Rodriguez > > > On 24 Oct 2013 at 17:47:13, Davide Dalle Carbonare > (davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it <mailto://davide.dallecarbonare@eng.it>) > wrote: > >> Dear partner, >> taking into consideration Laura's mail and Daniel's comments, I >> invite you >> to evaluate this proposal and provide your comments promptly ... >> >> D9.1 -> M36 >> D9.2 -> M36 >> D9.3 -> M33 >> D9.4 -> M33 >> >> this allow us to have more time on D9.1 for development and support >> on Catalogue, >> eLearning platform and myForge and close D9.3 and D9.4 as originally >> planned. >> Extending the D9.2 may help us to have the time to incorporate the >> indications from >> the letter we're going to send to the commission. Here I ask Osama >> (as responsible for >> this deliverable) to express his opinion. >> >> _*I ASK YOUR COMMENTS BY TOMORROW NOON*_ >> >> I remind you that the deadline for providing comments to Juanjo is >> tomorrow, >> otherwise we will send this proposal. >> >> kind regards, >> Davide >> >> >> On 24/10/2013 09:34, laura pucci wrote: >>> >>> Dear Davide, dear all, >>> >>> following the email coming by SAP, with respect to the extension >>> (and new deadline of WP9 deliverables), for sure within WP9 the >>> situation is a bit different, and goes also in parallel with the >>> definition of possible new plans for each WP9 partner. >>> >>> In particular, I’d like to share with you my doubts in postponing >>> the deliverables deadlines to M36. I’ll try to explain why below, so >>> to have your precious feedbacks on that. >>> >>> As far as I understood from Juanjo, during the next Review (M30 >>> Review) activities related to useless or not exploitable tools/GEs >>> will be almost certainly stopped by the reviewers, and this should >>> be true also for the Tools Chapter… BUT, given that the date of the >>> review will most probably be in January, i.e. M33 of the project, >>> there will be really few activities - in WP9 - or deliverables that >>> the Reviewers could freeze at that moment, since all SW (P) >>> Deliverables will be submitted at M33. >>> >>> Thus, the question here is, is it worthwhile to move all WP9 >>> deliverables from M33 to M36 so to foster the possible reviewers' >>> decision to stop them (thus cutting the remaining related effort)? >>> If we keep the delivery date of D9.x.x series at M33, I guess it >>> will be difficult for reviewers in January to stop an on-going work >>> to release deliverables due in January. >>> >>> Of course, these considerations could fit and make sense only if: >>> >>> 1) Due deliverables at M33 will be released on-time >>> >>> 2) New plans - on which each WP9 partner is arguing and thinking >>> in these days - do not require to postpone the deadlines of those >>> deliverables (delaying also activities). Thus, to understand these >>> plans now it’s crucial now, in order to understand the feasibility >>> of a (possible) extension also for the Tools Chapter. >>> >>> Please kindly let us know what is your thinking about my concerns. >>> >>> With many thanks in advance for your attention. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> Laura >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Scheibli, Daniel <mailto:daniel.scheibli at sap.com> >>> *To:* Davide Dalle Carbonare <mailto:davide.dallecarbonare at eng.it> >>> *Cc:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> <mailto:fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:12 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: >>> Extension of theproject duration >>> >>> Dear Davide, >>> >>> actually SAP has concerns regarding the extension and they are >>> currently being addresses with the consortium management / Juanjo. >>> >>> Regarding the move of M33 deliverables to M36, my question would >>> be what the motivation is? Do we feel that we really need that >>> >>> extra elapsed time? One down side will be, that it will >>> definitively increase the expectations towards the outcome. Also >>> I see the >>> >>> danger that it further exposes the tools to the situation >>> mentioned by Juanjo in the call we had with him last Thurday. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Daniel >>> >>> *From:* fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> [mailto:fiware-tools-bounces at lists.fi-ware.eu] *On Behalf Of* >>> Davide Dalle Carbonare >>> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 09:25 >>> *To:* fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> *Subject:* [Fiware-tools] Fwd: [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension >>> of the project duration >>> >>> Dear Partners, >>> please find below a main from Juanjo on the project extension. >>> I also attach the list of deliverables with some updates I've done. >>> >>> We already talked about the project extension during our lasts conf >>> calls with all the partners are in favor of that. >>> The shift of the dates for our deliverable is from M33 to M36 that >>> sounds acceptable from my side. >>> If you have some objection, please let me know in time to forward >>> them to Juanjo. >>> >>> kind regards, >>> Davide >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> >>> *Subject:* >>> >>> >>> >>> [Fiware-wpl] IMPORTANT: Extension of the project duration >>> >>> *Date:* >>> >>> >>> >>> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 07:36:09 +0200 >>> >>> *From:* >>> >>> >>> >>> Juanjo Hierro <jhierro at tid.es> <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> >>> >>> *To:* >>> >>> >>> >>> fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> <fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> <mailto:fiware-wpl at lists.fi-ware.eu>, >>> fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> <fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> <mailto:fiware-wpa at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> >>> *CC:* >>> >>> >>> >>> fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu <mailto:fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> <fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> <mailto:fiware-pcc at lists.fi-ware.eu> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As we have discussed a couple of times, the EC has suggested >>> an extension of the FI-WARE project duration for at least 4 >>> additional months. This was actually a recommendation given in >>> the last review report. >>> >>> This was a topic that I have encouraged you to discuss with >>> the teams in your respective chapters. >>> >>> During our meetings, it was also agreed that extension of the >>> project would mean a request to move the dates of those >>> deliverables linked to release of software and accompanying >>> documentation so that they change to be month 36 instead of >>> 33. Those deliverables linked to deployment of software on the >>> FI-PPP Testbed and FI-LAB which were planned for month 36 would >>> also be delayed until month 40. We didn't discuss this but I >>> guess we would agree that some of the final reports to be >>> produced should also be delayed from month 36 until month 40. >>> >>> So far, the only feedback I have got is that partners would be >>> ok for the proposed extension, provided the mentioned changes in >>> deliverable dates are incorporated. >>> >>> With all these considerations in mind, I have produced the >>> attached updated version of the Deliverable List. Changes are >>> highlighted so that you can easily track them. Of course, your >>> feedback is welcome. >>> >>> Unless I hear about any objection from your side before this >>> Friday EOB, I will submit an official response to the EC >>> announcing our agreement to extend the project duration another >>> 4 months (i.e., until end of August 2014), provided the changes >>> we propose in the deliverable dates are accepted. I will use >>> the attached table as basis although I'm happy to incorporate >>> some additional changes you may consider necessary. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> -- Juanjo >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------- >>> >>> Product Development and Innovation (PDI) - Telefonica Digital >>> >>> website:www.tid.es <http://www.tid.es> >>> >>> email:jhierro at tid.es <mailto:jhierro at tid.es> >>> >>> twitter: twitter.com/JuanjoHierro >>> >>> >>> >>> FI-WARE (European Future Internet Core Platform) Coordinator >>> >>> and Chief Architect >>> >>> >>> >>> FI-PPP Architecture Board chairman >>> >>> >>> >>> You can follow FI-WARE at: >>> >>> website:http://www.fi-ware.eu >>> >>> facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/FI-WARE/251366491587242 >>> >>> twitter:http://twitter.com/FIware >>> >>> linkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/groups/FIWARE-4239932 >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede >>> consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo >>> electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. >>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only >>> send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: >>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fiware-tools mailing list >>> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >>> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-tools mailing list >> Fiware-tools at lists.fi-ware.eu >> https://lists.fi-ware.eu/listinfo/fiware-tools -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/old-fiware-tools/attachments/20131025/b413ced5/attachment.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy