[Token-wp3] PUCs presentation (final review)

[luis at tlmat.unican.es]

Dear Kostas,

 

Many thanks for your remarks as the ones made by Stefano upon reaction on your e-mail. Laura and myself we will try to align our PUC4 presentation upon these comments. As I minor remark, I tend to say that it is not very appealing how we will try to continue gathering EU funds upon what has been built. But how we intent to set up each PUC ecosystems for fostering and consolidating it. Some ideas might be Private-Public Partnership, …

Kind regards

Luis

 

 

 

 

De: Konstantinos Glykos <glykos at iti.gr> 
Enviado el: miércoles, 31 de mayo de 2023 16:44
Para: Lynda O'Mahony <lynda.omahony at fundingbox.com>; Savvas Rogotis <rogotis.s at gmail.com>; Joris Finck (imec) <joris.finck at imec.be>; Domien Stubbe <Domien.Stubbe at vil.be>; 'Laura Rodríguez de Lope' <laura at tlmat.unican.es>; luis <luis at tlmat.unican.es>; stefano.depanfilis at fiware.org; Karen Vega <karen.vega at fiware.org>; token-wp3 at lists.fiware.org
CC: Clifton Walker, Judith Catherine <judith.clifton at unican.es>
Asunto: PUCs presentation (final review)

 

Dear all,

 

we were all present in the last EBM meeting in which we discussed about the final review agenda. However, a PUC wanted some details about the PUCs presentation, so it is a good chance to share my thoughts with all of you.

As it was agreed in the EBM meeting, each PUC will have 15 minutes time (without questions). It was agreed that the presentation of slides will take 5 minutes, while the video demo will take 10 minutes.

Stefano said in the EBM meeting that two important things to be explained by PUCs are:

*	how PUC used blockchain (especially from TOKEN blockchain services and components)
*	next steps (because PUCs said they will be alive and they have already achieved or try to achieve further funding by EU funded projects)

 

Moreover, please check yesterday's mail (arrived at 19:23 Berlin time) from Stefano (the email that has the conversation with Project Officer Giorgio Costantino) as well:

"In order to fully demonstrate the expected impact of the Project, in the Second Period the Team will have to tackle significant challenges, such as:

*	completing the Pilots and prove their benefits in the operational context;
*	finding potential users and adopters, and offering them a multidisciplinary support, that cannot be just technical
*	consider wider social and legal aspects related to the adoption the TOKEN service, which is also the core mission of the Call: they include crucial issues, such as the problem of social inclusion, the safe management and confidentiality of the private keys for SSI, but also the possible aspects related the new kind of business generated from data valorization, etc. "

 

So, I think that each PUC should speak about the pilot and the benefits (bullet 1).

 

Regarding KPIs (I was asked about them) there is no available time for KPIs presentation in PUC's 5-minute presentation. So, KPIs will be only presented in WP4's presentation by Judith.

 

So, in order to make a summary, I could propose the following pages for the PUC's 5-minute slide presentation (each PUC can add other pages as well):

*	Architecture (the role of blockchain should be explained here)
*	Achievements
*	Pilot
*	Lessons learnt
*	Next steps (why PUCs want further funding by EU funded projects)

 

PUCs can use as template the presentations from the project check folder: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/10LapOz70pSppZOGokrlKmLBW80OgyOfB <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/10LapOz70pSppZOGokrlKmLBW80OgyOfB__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!UfZuC9cVenWrHdbLTAROawJdDMakAaPUN0NTYBKVUuI-KEAmgAhkXXv9V4sfYy-T_BeqkBUk3kDzDYNt$> 

 

 

Thank you very much for one more time!

 

 

Best regards,

Kostas

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/token-wp3/attachments/20230531/1feb7a97/attachment-0001.html>