Yes, indeed. I count on Chris Greer for the panel on standardization (his name didn't come to my mind while I was writing my email). What I was mentioning here is that he might be involved eventually on the panel about Smart Cities, although I believe that may end up being pretty crowded in terms of speakers and it will be enough if we have him in the panel on standardization. Thank you for convincing him. I believe his presence is quite relevant. Cheers! -- Juanjo On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Jacques Magen (InterInnov) < jmagen at interinnov.eu> wrote: > Dear Juanjo, Bernardita, all, > > Concerning the point > > Last but not least, you may be aware about our collaboration with NIST > regarding standardization on Smart Cities. There will be a high-level > representative of NIST that will attend the FIWARE Summit. I was thinking > about inviting him to the panel on Standardization of Thursday December 15, > but it is one possibility just in case. > > This is exactly what I just suggested in my email i.e. to invite Chris > Greer from NIST in that panel. > Also I would like to remind you that Smart Cities is the focus of the > Global City Teams Challenge (GCTC) programme in which FIWARE is involved. > > Talk to you later, > > Jacques > > -- > > Jacques Magen > > *jmagen at interinnov.eu <jmagen at interinnov.eu>* > > Tel.: +33 9 81 03 98 49 / +33 7 60 46 50 23 > > www.interinnov.eu > > Twitter: @interinnov_eu <http://twitter.com/interinnov_eu> > > Skype: jacques.magen > > > Le 10/11/2016 à 14:34, Juan José Hierro a écrit : > > Dear Bernardita, > > Please let me share some input for the panel on Smart Cities. I keep > the rest on copy because it may help to see the ambition for this panel and > I hope this can stimulate others! > > First a little bit of background/confidential information, then I'll go > to the point on speakers I would propose for the panel. > > The FIWARE Foundation is about to sign a Joint Collaboration Program > with TMForum, a rather large and well-established industrial consortium, > particularly influential among service providers. Seeking for bringing > value to their membership, the TMForum started a Smart City Forum program > [1] around two years ago which is becoming more and more relevant in the > domain of Smart Cities, among other things thanks to the relevant resources > that an organisation like this can put in place. As examples of this we > can mention the work they have carried out together with cities like > Milton-Keynes [2] or the recent InFocus event in the city of Yinchuan [3] > (btw, just to let you know, they managed to make a deal with sponsors of > the event that meant they paid the trip and stay of more than 200 people :-) > > In their way to find what vision they could develop regarding Smart > Cities and promote among their members, they discovered FIWARE and its > relationship with OASC about one and a half year ago and they found it was > worth joining forces. They also found it very interesting our speech > regarding transformation of cities into enablers of an Economy of Data. > Later we join forces and developed the new release of the FIWARE Business > Ecosystem GE relying on TMForum APIs, which have became the basis for our > proposal about how to support data marketplaces using FIWARE. See [4-8] > for a description of our collaboration. > > As a result of our fruitful collaboration, the FIWARE Foundation and > TMForum will sign a Joint Collaboration Program (JCP) where we will try put > cities at work, moving from vision (OASC letter) to implementation (real > pilots and services in production adopting OASC principles). A > description of main aspects of this JCP can be found at: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QSWsu0AYdskMCnlRzIsVKKR > WYwYZN4B2NoVTQKR_t4/edit?usp=sharing > > > This program will comprise a series of workshops in different cities > where specific challenges will bet tackled and we will intend to engage > cities into specific pilots using FIWARE where OASC principles will be put > at work. > > Why I'm describing all this in the context of the FIWARE Summit? > > First, because we shall elaborate about all this during the terms of > reference presentation to give in the Panel on Smart Cities. I can of > course help in that. > > Second, because Carl Piva, VP of Strategic Partnerships within TMForum > will attend the FIWARE Summit in Málaga and he will be an excellent speaker > to join the panel. > > Third because during recent discussions, we found it would be a great > opportunity to colocate the first of the above mentioned workshops right > after the FIWARE Summit, i.e., on December 15 afternoon and December 16 > morning. We would certainly be able to engage the city of Málaga (I'm > already in conversations with them regarding this) and other cities in > Spain but, why not and through your contacts or contacts of TMForum, > additional cities across the globe. If that could be organised (I know it > is challenging given the short time :-) we may involve some of the city > representatives as speakers in the panel. > > Obviously, we should invite also someone representing OASC. I will > forward an invitation to them if you agree (Martin, Jarmo or Pieter would > be excellent speakers). > > Last but not least, you may be aware about our collaboration with NIST > regarding standardization on Smart Cities. There will be a high-level > representative of NIST that will attend the FIWARE Summit. I was thinking > about inviting him to the panel on Standardization of Thursday December 15, > but it is one possibility just in case. > > [1] - https://www.tmforum.org/smart-city-forum/ > [2] - https://inform.tmforum.org/smart-cities/2016/10/milton-key > nes-art-data-driven-cities/ > [3] - https://www.tmforum.org/events/smart-city-infocus-2016- > yinchuan-china/ > [4] - https://www.tmforum.org/press-and-news/tm-forum-and-fiware > -joinforces-to-speed-the-development-of-new-smart-city-services/ > <https://www.tmforum.org/press-and-news/tm-forum-and-fiware-join-forces-to-speed-the-development-of-new-smart-city-services/> > [5] - https://www.fiware.org/2016/04/27/fiware-and-tm-forum-at-t > he-dawn-of-the-data-economy/ > [6] - https://www.fiware.org/2016/05/10/fiware-at-tm-forum-live- > 2016-3-smart-city-solutions-3-success-stories/ > [7] - https://www.fiware.org/tag/tm-forum/ > [8] - https://www.fiware.org/2016/08/31/my-fiware-story-tm-forum/ > > Hope it helps moving forward a definition of the Panel on Smart Cities. > > Cheers, > > -- Juanjo > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Bernardita Cardenas < > bernardita at frontierservices.eu> wrote: > >> Dear Juanjo, >> >> Thank you for the minutes, clear and to the point! >> >> Let me know when we should talk or exchange ideas on the Smart Cities >> front. >> >> All the best >> >> >> >> *Bernardita Cárdenas* >> >> *Director* >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *<fiware-summit-program-committee-bounces at lists.fiware.org> on >> behalf of Juan José Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> >> *Date: *Friday 28 October 2016 at 09:27 >> *To: *<Fiware-summit-program-committee at lists.fiware.org> >> *Subject: *[Fiware-summit-program-committee] Minutes of the call >> 16-10-27 about coordination of the FIWARE Summit >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> You are receiving this email because we have registered you in the >> mailing list we have created for supporting the work of FIWARE Summit >> Program Committee. >> >> These are the minutes of the confcall we have had today. >> >> @All: Please review these minutes careful and confirm whether you >> understand and agree, otherwise raise any question/issue. >> >> The scope of each of the three parallel track of the programme were >> described including target audience (partly in the call, partly in the >> original mail, also in the current document shared on Google docs): >> >> Track >> >> Subtrack >> >> Target audience >> >> Goal >> >> Space where it will be hosted >> >> Expected number of attendees >> >> When >> >> Comments >> >> FIWARE Community >> >> Working meetings of FIWARE Technical Chapters >> >> Developers of the FIWARE OS community [1] >> >> coordination of activities >> >> Meeting rooms (one per chapter) >> >> approx. 100 (including all rooms) >> >> All three days >> >> FIWARE Technical Chapters already meet every week by confcall so this is >> an opportunity to meet f2f and do some more work together (mostly planning >> or architecture discussions) >> >> FIWARE Community >> >> Working Meetings of FIWARE Ecosystem Support Committees (ESCs: Mundus, >> Accelerator, iHubs) and FIWARE TSC (Technical Steering Committee) >> representatives >> >> representatives of ESCs and TSC >> [2] >> >> coordination of activities >> >> Meeting rooms (one main, two additional for parallel exercises) >> >> approx 20-30 >> >> First day and maybe third >> >> The agenda of these working meetings is somehow similar to agenda of A16 >> workshops in phase 3 of the FI-PPP >> >> Developers >> >> Developers' primer >> >> Any potential developer of apps based on FIWARE >> >> training on technology >> >> Aula room >> >> approx 100 >> >> First day and half of second >> >> Developers >> >> how-to sessions >> >> Any potential developer of apps based on FIWARE or developers willing to >> contribute to FIWARE >> >> training on technology, attract potential contributors >> >> Aula room >> >> approx 100 >> >> Half of second and third day >> >> Open Conference >> >> N/A >> >> Decision and policy makers, startup/SMEs CEOs and strategic decision >> makers, accelerators, potential new members of the FIWARE Foundation >> >> Dissemination of potential of FIWARE in three focus domains: Smart >> Cities, Smart Agrifood, Smart Industry. >> Dissemination of opportunities for SMEs, startups and other stakeholders >> joining the FIWARE ecosystem and joining the FIWARE Foundation as members >> >> Auditorium >> >> 200-300 >> >> Second and third days >> >> We need to come with an attractive program >> >> >> [1] Following best practices of open source communities, these meetings >> will be open so that any one can join (typically as observers). I don't >> expect there will be many people from the outside joining in this first >> Summit but it may happen and nevertheless we should allow it. >> [2] Following also best practices this meetings may be open to anyone who >> wish to join at least as observers. In any case, we shall send >> invitations to representatives of accelerators involved in phase 3 and any >> other accelerator we believe they may be interested >> >> More details about scope, etc of the program at: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uEwHjW162q3QwSwm4mTNov-U >> tdFhuneGPBpIBSacbl8/edit?usp=sharing >> >> A first sketched agenda is available at: >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1t7OyyDahvcsEPajYNjtg >> lxQndDPHfgD2IeT-3JPhwJM/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> Regarding Conference pannels linked to position of FIWARE in the >> different domains (Smart Cities, Smart Agrifood, Smart Industry) the >> following pattern was suggested: >> >> - 15 mins introductory presentation elaborating on why FIWARE is >> relevant and what are the benefits it does bring >> - 30 mins of a pannel discussion in the format of several speakers >> invited to have a discussion on stage answering questions of a moderator >> (no slides) >> >> During the confcall we reviewed the points where we need further >> development and what actions were needed. Here it is the summary of major >> points: >> >> - *@Sebas, with the support of @Sean*: will design a proposal for the >> agenda of the second subtrack of the FIWARE Community track (Working >> Meetings of FIWARE Ecosystem Support Committees (ESCs: Mundus, Accelerator, >> iHubs) and FIWARE TSC (Technical Steering Committee) representatives) >> >> >> - Agenda of previous A16 workshops in phase 3 could be a good input >> - Focus on topics that require coordination within ESCs and >> between ESCs and the TSC >> - *@All*: Bring input of topics that should be addressed during >> the meetings so that Sebas/Sean can take them into account in the design of >> the agenda >> >> >> - *@Bernartita/Juanjo*: prepare panel on Smart Cities for the >> Conference track (see agenda of second day) >> - *@Harald/Sjaak*: prepare panel on Smart Agrifood for the Conference >> track (see agenda of second day) >> - *@Nuria/<someone to invite, may be Oscar Lazaro from Innovalia?>*: >> prepare panel on Smart Industry for the Conference track (see agenda of >> second day) >> - *@Jacques/Federico*: prepare panel on FIWARE Mundus program (see >> agenda of second day) >> - *@Roi/Sean*: prepare panel on FIWARE Accelerator program (see >> agenda of second day) >> - *@All*: bring inputs for all the above (sending mails on this >> mailing list now that we have up and running) >> - *@Responsibles of pannels*: raise needs they may have for their >> panels (beyond the standard requirements) >> - *@All*: Bring input and first developed proposal of their assigned >> action to our next call >> - *@Juanjo*: setup a doodle for a follow-up confcall next week (we >> shall use GTM this time) >> >> >> >> Some questions we didn't have time to tackle: >> >> - Organization of exhibition area: goals, what to bring, reimburse >> travel costs for people exhibiting? >> - Reimbursement of travels for speakers in panels >> - Means for engaging target audiences >> - Agenda of second day for the Conference Track (we will come with a >> proposal anyways to next call) >> >> I believe this is all. Again: Please review these minutes carefully >> and confirm whether you understand and agree, otherwise raise any >> question/issue. Feedback and comments are of course welcomed. >> >> Best regards, >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Fiware-summit-program-committee mailing list >> Fiware-summit-program-committee at lists.fiware.org >> https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-summit-program-committee >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fiware-summit-program-committee mailing listFiware-summit-program-committee at lists.fiware.orghttps://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-summit-program-committee > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-summit-program-committee/attachments/20161110/5d9c341c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/png Size: 21796 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-summit-program-committee/attachments/20161110/5d9c341c/attachment.png>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy