Dear Stefano, indeed I also wrote to Ulrich. About the PS, following your message, I imagined Aurelien running to Docker's lawyers team saying "Paolo Alto, we have a problem" In general, many of the devops platforms restricted their free version and introduced "open source programmes" support, but Docker one, is the most restrictive I have seen so far... for example, CircleCI consider any public git repository with an open source license eligible for the programme. Cheers, *Dr. FEDERICO MICHELE FACCA* *CTO, Head of Martel Lab* +41 788075838 *MARTEL INNOVATE* <https://www.martel-innovate.com/> - INNOVATION, WE MAKE IT HAPPEN Click *HERE* to download Martel reports and white papers! <https://www.martel-innovate.com/premium-content/> Follow us on *TWITTER* <https://twitter.com/Martel_Innovate> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 17:45, Stefano De Panfilis < stefano.depanfilis at fiware.org> wrote: > dear federico, > > i agree with you on the urgency of the matter and we shall certainly put > this item at the next tsc agenda and thus the bod. i mean there is the need > for a formal request from the tsc to decide on this matter which is somehow > "technical". whatever we consider it anycase shall the topic shall be > treated in good synch and agreement by the two bodies. > honestly i do not see any particular issue. > > i was meaning your question in the ps part of your email, when you say in > a kind of "devil advocate" manner, to say the least ;-): "PS: I would > also argue that following your approach in a strict sense, you should not > accept even projects from Apache or other OS foundations, if they are > supported by commercial organizations (which is the case for 100% of > them, basically)." > > ciao, > stefano > > On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 17:27, Federico Michele Facca < > federico.facca at martel-innovate.com> wrote: > >> Dear Stefano, >> I am not sure what you mean by "last point", anyhow no reply so far by >> Aurelien. >> >> I am sure that FIWARE Foundation is eligible for the Open Source >> programme, and that may be a way to go (see option 1). >> >> In general, the limitations introduced may cause different problems, but >> the one I think that is i see more impacting to FIWARE is that for GEs >> hosted on single organisations (e.g. Martel, UPM, ect) docker hub >> repository the following limitations apply: >> >> - 100 pulls for not registered users >> - 200 pulls for registered users >> >> So beyond 100 daily pull from a repository (if unregistered as in most of >> the cases when just using containers), people will get an error... Think >> for example if we organize a hackathon: the treshould will be reached in >> seconds :/ >> >> Cheers, >> >> *Dr. FEDERICO MICHELE FACCA* >> *CTO, Head of Martel Lab* >> +41 788075838 >> *MARTEL INNOVATE* <https://www.martel-innovate.com/> - INNOVATION, WE >> MAKE IT HAPPEN >> Click *HERE* to download Martel reports and white papers! >> <https://www.martel-innovate.com/premium-content/> >> Follow us on *TWITTER* <https://twitter.com/Martel_Innovate> >> >> >> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 17:06, Stefano De Panfilis < >> stefano.depanfilis at fiware.org> wrote: >> >>> dear federico, >>> >>> did you get an answer from aurélien about your last point which is >>> definitely quite tricky? >>> >>> ciao, >>> stefano >>> >>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 10:21, Federico Michele Facca < >>> federico.facca at martel-innovate.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear All, >>>> recently terms and conditions of Docker Hub usage changed a lot, and >>>> unless willing to pay, this is going to affect all organisations with free >>>> accounts that >>>> use Docker Hub to distribute docker images of their FIWARE GEs. >>>> >>>> Options I see: >>>> - All official GEs are just hosted under FIWARE Docker Hub repo. >>>> -> Pro: FIWARE Foundation should be able to get the OS status >>>> recognition, and so no limitation will apply. >>>> -> Cons: maintainers will lose visibility, and users will need to be >>>> duly informed of changing the repo to use docker images. >>>> >>>> - Maintainers move to alternative solutions to Docker Hub. >>>> -> Pro: Maintainers will retain visibility. >>>> -> Cons: Users will need to be duly informed of changing the repo to >>>> use docker images. >>>> >>>> *Dr. FEDERICO MICHELE FACCA* >>>> *CTO, Head of Martel Lab* >>>> +41 788075838 >>>> *MARTEL INNOVATE* <https://www.martel-innovate.com/> - INNOVATION, WE >>>> MAKE IT HAPPEN >>>> Click *HERE* to download Martel reports and white papers! >>>> <https://www.martel-innovate.com/premium-content/> >>>> Follow us on *TWITTER* <https://twitter.com/Martel_Innovate> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>>> From: Federico Michele Facca <federico.facca at martel-innovate.com> >>>> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 10:14 >>>> Subject: Re: Your eligibility for the Docker Open Source Program >>>> To: Aurelien Suarez <aurelien-suarez at docker.com> >>>> Cc: Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org>, Ulrich Ahle < >>>> ulrich.ahle at fiware.org> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dear Aurelien, >>>> The components we deliver open source are part of the FIWARE Open >>>> Source platform which is backed by a non profit organization: the FIWARE >>>> Foundation. >>>> Simply as a way of working FIWARE does not force to >>>> transfer repositories under the control of the association, they just >>>> mirror them. >>>> You can check, for example, that quantumleap is listed here: >>>> https://www.fiware.org/developers/catalogue/ >>>> >>>> This is the case for the projects part of FIWARE (e.g. Context Broker, >>>> maintained by Telefonica), unless maintained and developed by the FIWARE >>>> Foundation itself. >>>> Clearly, if contributors like us, cannot benefit, that's gonna affect >>>> large part of the project of parf of FIWARE, unless the single organisation >>>> are willing to pay Docker hub subscriptions. I assume, being a lot of >>>> them SMEs, it's easier that they will give up on Docker hub. >>>> >>>> @Juanjo Hierro <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> @Ulrich Ahle >>>> <ulrich.ahle at fiware.org> I guess this is something we can put in the >>>> Agenda of the next Board of Directors of the Foundation, to decide a common >>>> strategy >>>> to tackle the issue. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Federico >>>> >>>> PS: I would also argue that following your approach in a strict sense, >>>> you should not accept even projects from Apache or other OS foundations, if >>>> they are supported >>>> by commercial organizations (which is the case for 100% of them, >>>> basically). >>>> >>>> >>>> *Dr. FEDERICO MICHELE FACCA* >>>> *CTO, Head of Martel Lab* >>>> +41 788075838 >>>> *MARTEL INNOVATE* <https://www.martel-innovate.com/> - INNOVATION, WE >>>> MAKE IT HAPPEN >>>> Click *HERE* to download Martel reports and white papers! >>>> <https://www.martel-innovate.com/premium-content/> >>>> Follow us on *TWITTER* <https://twitter.com/Martel_Innovate> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 at 10:00, Aurelien Suarez < >>>> aurelien-suarez at docker.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Federico, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you once again for submitting your application to the Docker >>>>> Open Source Program. The Docker Open Source program is designed to help >>>>> non-commercial members of the open-source continue driving the adoption of >>>>> their software. Among other benefits, for approved Open Source Program >>>>> contributors, we whitelist their organizations’ namespaces so that pulls >>>>> from their users are not subject to the policies for data pull rates. >>>>> >>>>> We have designed this program to help individual contributors, >>>>> nonprofits and educational institutions. Because your project is backed by >>>>> a commercial organization, we regret to inform you that your Docker >>>>> namespace is not eligible. For the ISVs ineligible for our Open Source >>>>> Program, we offer competitively priced services for low-friction >>>>> distribution of ISVs’ software. >>>>> >>>>> Please let us know if the Docker new policies for data pull rates are >>>>> impacting your business operations, and we will connect you with the >>>>> appropriate support. >>>>> >>>>> We appreciate all your support for the Docker open-source community. >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Aurélien Suarez >>>>> >>>>> Community Marketing Intern >>>>> >>>>> Docker. >>>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________________________________________________ >>>> >>>> You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies on >>>> the following links: >>>> - https://wiki.fiware.org/FIWARE_Privacy_Policy >>>> - https://wiki.fiware.org/Cookies_Policy_FIWARE >>>> >>>> >>>> fiware-technical-committee mailing list >>>> fiware-technical-committee at lists.fiware.org >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from fiware-technical-committee mailing list, go to the >>>> information page of the list at: >>>> https://lists.fiware.org/listinfo/fiware-technical-committee >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Stefano De Panfilis >>> Chief Operating Officer >>> stefano.depanfilis at fiware.org <charlotte.kotterman at fiware.org> >>> www.fiware.org >>> Mob: +393357542567 >>> Skype: depa01 >>> twitter: depa01 >>> >>> <https://twitter.com/fiware> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- > Stefano De Panfilis > Chief Operating Officer > stefano.depanfilis at fiware.org <charlotte.kotterman at fiware.org> > www.fiware.org > Mob: +393357542567 > Skype: depa01 > twitter: depa01 > > <https://twitter.com/fiware> > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/fiware-technical-committee/attachments/20210819/0d1ac7ab/attachment-0001.html>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy