Thumbs Up Emoji (U+1F44D) On 14/4/21 13:30, Angeles Tejado wrote: > Juanjo, makes sense to have the SMEs journey in the D1.5 yes. > > And we will align with both deliverables after the call on Friday. > That is the reason why in the comss deliverable this onboarding, > ambassadors, scouting is still pending. > > BR. > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 08:01, Juanjo Hierro > <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org <mailto:juanjose.hierro at fiware.org>> wrote: > > Hi, > > What I have proposed and continue proposing is to align in terms > of steps that Rajiv was proposing with the steps in 3.6.1 of D2.1 > which are based on a well proven methodology based on your > experience. I believe making that alignment would not be that > difficult reading contents of what Rajiv wrote and you wrote and > that alignment would be beneficial (among other things when we > present both deliverables to reviewers, for example). Section > 3.6.1 is focused on communication therefore there are elements on > what he wrote in D1.5 which may extend, further develop, contents > of section 3.6.1 and are meaningful to keep in D1.5 because that > is the deliverable that should contain everything we want DIHs to > read. It should be self-contained in that respect. In the > meeting about D1.5 we commented that this would mean copying > certain parts of other deliverables in D1.5 (and that is behind > the assignment of people to sections of that deliverable) but that > is fine because we don't pretend to make all deliverables public > nor make DIHs reall all the deliverables. > > During the peer review of that section in D1.5, besides checking > that the alignment is appropriate you may decide what may be worth > adding in section 3.6.1 of D2.1. > > If we find difficulties in the alignment, let's arrange a call. > > Regarding the journey of SMEs, they are one of our target as you > well explain in D2.1. My question was more whether we should add > some explicit section and words about "SMEs journey" in D1.5 which > is the kin we want DIHs to read. The scouting performed by the > DIHs, is connected to activities the DIHs would carried out in > connection to this SME journey and we agreed we would add a > section to describe the scouting within D1.5, the same way we > agreed to describe multi-tier support in D1.5 (high-level because > details will go in D1.11) and other pparts. Those are elements > that explain what we want DIHs to do to jointly support with us > the SMEs journey. My point is more whether explicitly elaborating > on the concept of "SME journey" somewhere in D1.5 makes sense and > create a connection between support that DIHs should bring in that > "SME journey" with different sections of the document. I believe > it would make sense. But if everyone believes that is not needed > because it will be implicit when DIHs read the whole onboarding > kit, that is also fine with me. > > Cheers, > > Juanjo > > > On 14/4/21 07:19, Angeles Tejado wrote: >> Hi Juanjo >> >> The deliverable 2.1 is not finished as nobody commented nor >> completed the pending sections and therefore I am waiting for the >> onboarding to be finished D1.5 DIH Onboarding Kit >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nGEnlMB8Vjs6bsnGdDUsTYRWlp-JjY6gKqHo9TSABKg/edit?usp=sharing> so >> do not use it as a reference. Precisely the community building >> part is work in progress and related to the whole action plan >> (timming and action for communications). >> >> The complete customer journey is in the communication plan as >> this is a pure MarCom funnel. Will be a part of the community >> strategy chapter together with the community entry points. That >> means DIHs onboarding:community management and comms related, >> Ambassadors: community management, comms and marketing related; >> scouting: SMEs activation and comms related; etc... >> >> Regarding your question: "shouldn't we also explain to DIHs how >> we expect they will support in the journey of SMEs? >> >> Target audiences and channels are defined in the comms plan. DIHs >> are a "channel" to reach SMEs and this will be perfectly defined >> in the comms plan. How DIHs will support the journey from your >> tech perspective is *scouting*, from our side is a comms kit for >> Ambassadors to attract SMEs including all the info that an SME >> needs to know if they want to share data or if they have data, >> info on the verticals, kind of experiments... It is a landing >> page with the logos and challenges >> >> It is comms. But as I said, waiting for you to finish the >> onboarding to align. When I shared the D.2.1 I was expecting to >> work in those pending sections together but I see that those >> sections will be part of the Onboarding Kit so I can take from >> there and adapt. >> >> Best >> >> >> >> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 01:38, Juanjo Hierro >> <juanjose.hierro at fiware.org <mailto:juanjose.hierro at fiware.org>> >> wrote: >> >> Dear Rajiv, >> >> You have added a chapter focused on the DIH Journey within >> the D1.5 DIH Onboarding Kit >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nGEnlMB8Vjs6bsnGdDUsTYRWlp-JjY6gKqHo9TSABKg/edit?usp=sharing>. >> >> Steps, with their corresponding description, should align >> with steps/phases in section 3.1.6 Methodology >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o-4nnGn6zjNFJH9txLA7YCXyg-10mNCvZX9H3N6KfoA/edit#heading=h.sq6zffnxhykk> >> of deliverable D2.1 - Communication and Dissemination Plan M6 >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o-4nnGn6zjNFJH9txLA7YCXyg-10mNCvZX9H3N6KfoA/edit?usp=sharing>. >> On the other hand, I believe that there are contents you >> generated that are nice. >> >> Could you propose a new version of the Journey considering >> the phases in section 3.1.6 of D2.1 that Angeles can peer >> review ? >> >> This way everything gets aligned when we tell DIHs what are >> the journeys we expect they will go through. >> >> Question: shouldn't we also explain to DIHs how we expect >> they will support in the journey of SMEs? I tend to believe >> so and therefore we should describe that somewhere in D1.5. >> Again, it follows the steps/phases described in 3.1.6, but we >> may focus on where within that journey we expect that DIHs >> will contribute and how. >> >> An editorial comment: rather that explaining the DIH >> journey as a chapter right after the introduction in D1.5, I >> would go for creating a section within the chapter "The role >> of Digital Innovation Hubs (DIHs" titled "DIH Journey" right >> after the section describing i4Trust Ambassadors. Rationale >> is that I believe that within description of the Journey we >> need to talk about LEBDS, Ambassadors, etc, therefore it is >> better if the definition has been given before. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Juanjo Hierro >> Chief Technology Officer >> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org <mailto:juanjose.hierro at fiware.org> >> www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro> >> Twitter: @fiware <https://twitter.com/fiware> @JuanjoHierro >> <https://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20210414/44b95244/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: foundation-logo.png Type: image/png Size: 8201 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20210414/44b95244/attachment-0001.png>
You can get more information about our cookies and privacy policies clicking on the following links: Privacy policy Cookies policy