[I4trust] IMPORTANT: D6.2 Data Management Plan deliverable

[Juanjo Hierro]

Hi everyone,

   Can iSHARE Foundation and FundingBox confirm they are reviewing this 
deliverable?

   @FundingBox: please at least provide feedback on the mentioned parts

   Cheers,

   Juanjo


On 22/2/21 10:25, Juanjo Hierro wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>   Also with quite a delay, we have produced a first draft of the D6.2 
> Data Management Plan 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UEQbT2W_tnqxkEfLTNFmRlLfhCDnr3drRqar2Oz7vCc/edit?usp=sharing> 
> deliverable.
>
>   Please run a peer review of this deliverable and provide comments as 
> well as suggested editorial changes but, please in this later case, 
> under "suggest edits" mode.
>
>   Many thanks to Sherifa who has contributed largely to the task of 
> generating this draft.
>
>   Target goal would be to get the deliverable approved by the general 
> coordination meeting this week.   Therefore, please take your time to 
> carefully review.
>
>   I would encourage both @FundingBox and @iSF to carefully review 
> contents of this deliverable.   I would encourage particularly 
> @FundingBox to review everything that may have to do with:
>
>  1. management of personal data in the FundingBox platform used for
>     the i4Trust Community
>  2. management of personal data within experiments selected through
>     the Open Calls
>
>   With regards to the second point, I guess we may need to consider 
> the following points:
>
>   * i4Trust partners won't be storing data shared through experiments
>     ... however, experiments will typically involve end users for
>     which some personal data may be gathered ... what provisions
>     should we place in that respect?   Please check if what is
>     described is enough
>   * One example of personal data that experiments may gather from end
>     users is data used to identify them within applications, as well
>     as data about roles of users within applications ... this data
>     would typically registered in Identity Management services and
>     Authorization Registry services they may deploy and setup on their
>     own through instatiation of i4Trust software components.  On the
>     other hand, we were planning to also provide global instances of
>     such services which they could rely on rather than instantiating
>     because this will help them to accelerate development of
>     experiments initially.
>
>   @FundingBox: Do you have experience of a similar scenario within 
> other cascade-funding projects and what were the provisions in such cases?
>
>   @iSF: your views on the matter would be also highly appreciated.
>
>   Please turn your response in specific commments and suggested edits.
>
>   Best regards,
>
> -- 
> Document
> Juanjo Hierro
> Chief Technology Officer
> juanjose.hierro at fiware.org <mailto:juanjose.hierro at fiware.org>
> www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jhierro>
> Twitter: @fiware <https://twitter.com/fiware> @JuanjoHierro 
> <https://twitter.com/JuanjoHierro>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20210224/48fc4172/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: foundation-logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8201 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.fiware.org/private/i4trust/attachments/20210224/48fc4172/attachment.png>